<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Market Clearing Price of Unloading The Dishwasher</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dworin.net/2008/06/03/market-clearing-price-of-unloading-the-dishwasher/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dworin.net/2008/06/03/market-clearing-price-of-unloading-the-dishwasher/</link>
	<description>100% Pure Awesome</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.dworin.net/2008/06/03/market-clearing-price-of-unloading-the-dishwasher/#comment-8565</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 00:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dworin.net/?p=228#comment-8565</guid>
		<description>Great question, Anonymous Poster.  For something like dishes, it's pretty easy to assign ownership and enforce responsibility, so while the "cleanliness" is still a public good, its easier to figure out who needs to maintain it.  You could use the above system, but "clean your own dish" would probably work, the only problem being enforcement.   

For something like sweeping, or dusting, though, where it's a true public good, the market system would work pretty well.  The traveling roommate would contribute less to the mess, but because they aren't there as often, they'd also likely set a lower value to having the place clean.  Granted, nobody wants to come back to a shitty apartment, but in dollar terms, whats that worth to you?  Under the above system, you set that price, and either pay it to the other roommate, or to a third party who will do the cleaning.

Clearly there's still some kinks that need to be worked out in the idea before anyone tries to implement it, and I wouldn't suggest using it with a live-in girlfriend.  The economic logic might hold, but a "pareto optimal" living situation isn't the same thing as a happy one (that's why you have to put the toilet seat down).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great question, Anonymous Poster.  For something like dishes, it&#8217;s pretty easy to assign ownership and enforce responsibility, so while the &#8220;cleanliness&#8221; is still a public good, its easier to figure out who needs to maintain it.  You could use the above system, but &#8220;clean your own dish&#8221; would probably work, the only problem being enforcement.   </p>
<p>For something like sweeping, or dusting, though, where it&#8217;s a true public good, the market system would work pretty well.  The traveling roommate would contribute less to the mess, but because they aren&#8217;t there as often, they&#8217;d also likely set a lower value to having the place clean.  Granted, nobody wants to come back to a shitty apartment, but in dollar terms, whats that worth to you?  Under the above system, you set that price, and either pay it to the other roommate, or to a third party who will do the cleaning.</p>
<p>Clearly there&#8217;s still some kinks that need to be worked out in the idea before anyone tries to implement it, and I wouldn&#8217;t suggest using it with a live-in girlfriend.  The economic logic might hold, but a &#8220;pareto optimal&#8221; living situation isn&#8217;t the same thing as a happy one (that&#8217;s why you have to put the toilet seat down).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Question</title>
		<link>http://blog.dworin.net/2008/06/03/market-clearing-price-of-unloading-the-dishwasher/#comment-8544</link>
		<dc:creator>Question</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dworin.net/?p=228#comment-8544</guid>
		<description>Are all roomates equally contributing to creating that public good mess?  For example, if one roomate is gone traveling 2/3rds of the week, and doesn't contribute to as much dish usage, or general mess, should that factor into the equation?  Or if a roomate never uses dishes because they eat out all the time.  Both general mess and dishes are typically considered public domain, but if one person essentially doesn't contribute to that public mess 2/3rds of the week, should that person have less responsibilty for cleaning?  How do you weight contribution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are all roomates equally contributing to creating that public good mess?  For example, if one roomate is gone traveling 2/3rds of the week, and doesn&#8217;t contribute to as much dish usage, or general mess, should that factor into the equation?  Or if a roomate never uses dishes because they eat out all the time.  Both general mess and dishes are typically considered public domain, but if one person essentially doesn&#8217;t contribute to that public mess 2/3rds of the week, should that person have less responsibilty for cleaning?  How do you weight contribution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mom</title>
		<link>http://blog.dworin.net/2008/06/03/market-clearing-price-of-unloading-the-dishwasher/#comment-8379</link>
		<dc:creator>mom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dworin.net/?p=228#comment-8379</guid>
		<description>Nice, very nice.  So how much is it worth to have me cook, clean, turn down your bed and put mints on your pillow?  Hilton bucks?  Marriot dollars?  Or, as some have suggested for years, this is the Ritz and out of your league?  ILY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice, very nice.  So how much is it worth to have me cook, clean, turn down your bed and put mints on your pillow?  Hilton bucks?  Marriot dollars?  Or, as some have suggested for years, this is the Ritz and out of your league?  ILY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
